Arghaa HR Technologies flagship division of Arghaa HR Solutions LLP is a Management Business Process Organization managed by highly stupendous professionals from across industries, is bound towards facilitating Organizational Renovation, Managing Human Side Changes eventually creating.
Arghaa Hr Technologies, Flat no1, shreenath apartment, sevilimedu
Kanchipuram
Tamilnadu
631502
India

Latest Labour Law Judgments July 2019.

REPORTED JUDGMENTS AT A GLANCE July 2019

Compensation in lieu of reinstatement appropriate after 19 years of litigation. Supreme Court 709

Striking workers will not prevent ingress and egress of willing workmen and material and to remain 200 meters away from factory. Mad. HC 716

High Court can quash criminal proceedings only if there is miscarriage of justice.P&H HC 713

Workman entitled to reinstatement with back wages when his resignation was obtained forcefully.Del. HC 711

Employees of contractor will not be treated as employees of Bank.Cal. HC 718

Bonus Act not applicable on education institutions not with profits motive. Mad. HC 727

Bonus Act applicable upon a factory even run by a trust.Mad. HC 738

Compensation not payable when accident took place outside factory during lunch hours.Mad. HC 724

Adverse presumptions drawn if employer fails to produce attendance and salary registers to controvert 240 working days by a workman.Supreme Court 743

Industrial Tribunal cannot interfere in the enquiry by Internal Complaint Committee under POSH Act. Mad. HC 769

Death due to heart attack to be treated as accident for compensation when there was no ailment. Chhat. HC 745

Reinstatement not appropriate when employer offered duty to workman in written statement. Del. HC 758

Challenging of award after 4½ years not tenable in absence of any reason for delay. P&H HC 715

Police has to provide protection to employer to ensure ingress and regress of man and material by strikers. Mad. HC 716

Bank employees will be entitled to minimum wages fixed by State and not Central government. Cal. HC 718

Contractor employees to be counted for coverage of an establishment under ESI Act. Chhat. HC 719

Employer is bound to act upon the recommendations of Internal Complaint Committee under POSH Act.Mad. HC 769

Ex-parte award to be set aside only when sufficient cause is shown for non-appearance. P&H HC 764

Canteen facility not mandatory when there are less than 250 workers in a factory. Mad. HC 724

Workman to prove to have worked for 240 days in 12 months.Supreme Court 743

Misappropriation by a bus conductor justifies his dismissal from service. Karn. HC 765

Status of a ‘protected workman’ can be denied when he is facing enquiry or a criminal trial. Karn. HC 767

An enquiry under POSH Act has to be as per mechanism evolved by Supreme Court. Mad. HC 769

Reinstatement appropriate when enquiry against workman is vitiated. Supreme Court 743

Employer can produce evidence in Labour Court when enquiry is vitiated. Karn. HC 765

EMPLOYEES’ PROVIDENT FUNDS & MP ACT

An order by RPFC based on report of Enforcement Officer is liable to be set aside. Pat. HC 787

Employee can avail higher pension even after receiving the EPF on depositing back with interest. Mad. HC 799

No fault of an employee applying for pension which was not processed by the Department. MP HC 781

An order passed by EPF authorities without identification of beneficiaries not sustainable. Pat. HC 791

Delay in releasing the EPF dues would attract interest and penal interest. MP HC 785

Attachment of bank account to remain suspended when employer participated in proceedings held ex-parte under section 7-A. All. HC 796

Failure to pay EPF contribution of employees of contractor untenable if such objections not taken initially by principal employer. Del. HC 812

Writ petition tenable against order of EPF authorities when Tribunal is not functioning. Karn. HC 810

RPFC cannot challenge his own order in the Tribunal. Karn. HC 811

Instalment for assessed damages can be allowed to an employer facing financial crisis. Mad. HC 799

Employees entitled to enhanced pension on actual salary received by EPFO. Mad. HC 799

Writ petition untenable against an order under section 7-A of the Act. Mad. HC 801

Once the principal employer signs the list of employees of contractors, he cannot say beneficiaries were not identified. Del. HC 812

No appeal tenable against levy of interest for the late payment. Mad. HC 802

An order passed by violating principles of natural justice is liable to be quashed. Mad. HC 802

Writ against order under section 7A untenable when employer failed to file an appeal before Tribunal. Mad. HC 805

RPFChas no delegated power to challenge his own order in the Tribunal. Pat. HC 786

An employee entitled for pension from the date of option. MP HC 781

EPF Authority has to settle the accounts of the member of the EPF Scheme at earliest possible. MP HC 785

Mere non-mentioning of provision of law in review petition would not be fatal. Uttr. HC 795

Once default takes place on the part of employer, EPF Authority can initiate proceedings. Del. HC 812

Levy of interest sans opportunity for hearing unsustainable. Mad. HC 802

High Court can also waive or reduce the pre-deposit necessary for admission of appeal before Tribunal. Karn. HC 810

Employer can escape liability for contribution of employees of contractor only when proper record is maintained. Del. HC 812

Levy of damages and interest not to be set aside when employer has deposited without taking any objection in initial enquiry.Del. HC 812

Courtesy Labour Law Reporter.

Top