Arghaa HR Technologies flagship division of Arghaa HR Solutions LLP is a Management Business Process Organization managed by highly stupendous professionals from across industries, is bound towards facilitating Organizational Renovation, Managing Human Side Changes eventually creating.
Arghaa Hr Technologies, Flat no1, shreenath apartment, sevilimedu
Kanchipuram
Tamilnadu
631502
India

Latest Labour Law Judgments at a Glance - September 2023

IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS September 2023- Reported Judgments at Glance

Non-compliance retrenchment conditions will render it illegal. 2023 LLR 945 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

A shop for repairing and selling electronic goods will be a 'factory' to be covered under ESI. 2023 LLR 949 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Supreme Court will not interfere in the reasoned order of the Compensation Commissioner. 2023 LLR 951 ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Transferring from one branch to another is possible even when not mentioned in the appointment letter.2023 LLR 963 BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Back-wages are not automatic on every reinstatement. 2023 LLR 982 GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Those assisting the customers in a shop would not be salesmen. 2023 LLR 945 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Plea of full and final settlement, if not taken in lower forums, cannot be taken in the Higher Court. 2023 LLR 953 ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Transfer to a branch would be justified even if it did not exist in the employee's appointment.2023 LLR 982 GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Conditions of service can be changed only after 21 days' notice. 2023 LLR 969 DELHI HIGH COURT

Termination of contractual appointment would not be retrenchment. 2023 LLR 970 DELHI HIGH COURT

Transfer of employees from one place to another is an incident of service. 2023 LLR 979 GAUHATI HIGH COURT

A terminated employee on acquittal cannot claim back wages. 2023 LLR 982 GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Trainees 'not being workmen' cannot claim relief under Industrial Disputes Act. 2023 LLR 986 KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Compensation of Rs.5 Lac on terminating a probationer with one year's service is unjustified. 2023 LLR 997 PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

The person looking after the day-to-day affairs of the company, not the directors, are liable to be prosecuted under Contract Labour (R&A) Act. 2023 LLR 999 JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

Every dispute is not necessarily to be referred for adjudication. 2023 LLR 1014 HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Percentage of accident injury for compensation is to be decided by the Commissioner, not by the higher court. 2023 LLR 951 ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Director cannot be prosecuted when he has no control over the day-to-day affairs of the company. 2023 LLR 1028 CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

EPF

Even a single day's delay in depositing EPF dues invites penal consequences. 2023 LLR 1018 BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Although not justifiable for escaping liability, financial crises be overlooked by the EPF authorities. 2023 LLR 1025 CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Trainees under standing orders not covered under EPF Act. 2023 LLR 1039 MADRAS HIGH COURT

Levy of damages along with interest can be challenged before the Tribunal, not in the writ petition. 2023 LLR 1046 MADRAS HIGH COURT

Stipends paid to apprentices under Apprentices Act are not wages to attract EPF contribution. 2023 LLR 1040 MADRAS HIGH COURT

Damages for delayed deposit of EPF contributions only when the employer is properly heard. 2023 LLR 1054 KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

The EPF Act is applicable to municipalities. 2023 LLR 1048 MADRAS HIGH COURT

Levy of damages for delayed deposit is a quasi-judicial function hence, defaulters must be given reasonable opportunity. 2023 LLR 1054 KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Directors are not employees within Explanation 2 of sections 405 and 406 of IPC. 2023 LLR 1028 CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Trainees getting a stipend are excluded under the EPF Act. 2023 LLR 1039 MADRAS HIGH COURT

Workers of contractors are also covered under the EPF Act. 2023 LLR 1048 MADRAS HIGH COURT

Discretionary powers to vary the percentage of damages vests with the EPF authority. 2023 LLR 1054 KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Penal damages are to be levied for non-deposit of EPF contribution for a terminated employee. 2023 LLR 1052 KERALA HIGH COURT

No leniency for levy of damages on habitual defaulting employers even when there were no financial crises. 2023 LLR 1054 KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

An order passed for the levy of damages must be a reasoned one. 2023 LLR 1025 CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Fastening liability on excluded establishments is legally unsustainable. 2023 LLR 1020 BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Director is not personally liable to pay EPF dues. 2023 LLR 1028 CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Courtesy- Labour Law Reporter.

Top