Arghaa HR Technologies flagship division of Arghaa HR Solutions LLP is a Management Business Process Organization managed by highly stupendous professionals from across industries, is bound towards facilitating Organizational Renovation, Managing Human Side Changes eventually creating.
Arghaa Hr Technologies, Flat no1, shreenath apartment, sevilimedu
Kanchipuram
Tamilnadu
631502
India

Latest Labour Law Judgments April 2018

Reported Judgments at Glance April 2018

·         A union leader must be a role model of integrity and law abiding. Karn. HC 417

·         Civil Courts can’t grant reinstatement to a dismissed employee.   Mad. HC 394

·         Loss of 70% earning capacity of a driver appropriate for accident compensation.  Supreme Court 343

·         Unexplained and inordinate delay would justify setting aside of dismissal.  Supreme Court 344

·         Appeal against recommendations of Internal Committee of POSH Act is to be filed within 90 days.  Ker. HC 363

·         Awarding back wages sans supporting reasons not tenable. Mad. HC 360

·         Validity of an enquiry to be decided as preliminary issue. Supreme Court 371

·         Reinstatement with back wages appropriate when termination is illegal. P&H HC 355

·         Casual or part time worker having worked for 240 days will get protection under ID Act. Guj. HC 402

·         General Manager of a Corporation not a ‘workman’. Supreme Court 368

·         Dismissal is justified for pilferage and causing loss. Karn. HC 415

·         Employer can adduce evidence when an enquiry is vitiated. Supreme Court 371

·         Unaided educational institutions are covered by ESI. Mad. HC 382

·         Gratuity can be forfeited only when an employee is guilty of misconducts under the Act. Mad. HC 384

·         Order of Controlling Authority can be challenged only in appeal. Del. HC 390

·         Courts would interfere when punishment is too harsh. Karn. HC 415

·         Beneficial legislation is to be interpreted for welfare of workers. Ker. HC 406

·         Legal representation is not permissible in an enquiry. Mad. HC 394

·         For banks and insurance companies, appropriate government will be Central for POSH Act. Ker. HC 363

·         Non-payment of suspension allowance would vitiate an enquiry.  Supreme Court 344

·         An incorrigible employee does not deserve sympathy. Karn. HC 415

·         Punishment can be interfered by Labour Court despite valid enquiry. Supreme Court 371

·         No reinstatement on the loss of confidence of employer. P&H HC 424

·         Past record, when stigmatic, would not justify reduction of punishment.  Karn. HC 415

EMPLOYEES’ PROVIDENT FUNDS & MP ACT

·         Imposition of cost justified when employer failed to produce records despite 18 opportunities. P&H HC 433

·         Tribunal can pass interim order with or without any condition on admission of appeal. Del. HC 443

·         Owner of establishment is liable to make payment of EPF dues. P&H HC 441

·         Copy of the report of EO is to be provided to an employer before initiating proceeding u/s 7A of the Act. Bom. HC 457

·         An appeal against the composite order for levy of damages and interest is tenable.Del. HC 430

·         Order of attachment is illegal before limitation period of 60 days in filing appeal. Karn. HC 437

·         Damages for delayed remittance of EPF contributions not to be waived  Karn. HC 440

·         High Court can defer recovery proceedings if the P.O. of EPFT is not functioning. Ker. HC 435

·         Lifting of attachment order justified when major part of amount is deposited. Mad. HC 436

·         Appeal is not maintainable against every order of PF Authority. P&H HC 434

·         Allowing installments justified when major amount as determined is paid by government department. Ker. HC 442

·         EPF dues can be recovered from previous and present owners of establishment. P&H HC 441

·         Exemption under section 17 of the Act, would not exclude the employer from purview of the Act. Uttr. HC 446

·         EPF authority can recover the determined amount in absence of a stay.  Del. HC 443

·         75% pre-deposit of determined amount is a prescribed condition for admission of appeal before EPFT.  Del. HC 430

·         Attachment order is rightly revoked for releasing wages of employees. Mad. HC 436

·         Withdrawal of exemption justified when employer switched over to LIC for EDLI scheme. Uttr. HC 446

·         Admission of default would not justify the absence of mens rea. Karn. HC 440

·         An appeal is not tenable against the order for levy of interest.   Del. HC 430

·         Withdrawal of exemption justified when the establishment did not maintain the records as prescribed. Uttr. HC 446

·         EPFO will return illegally recovered amount.   Karn. HC 437

·         Provident Fund is to mitigate the suffering of workers.  Karn. HC 440

·         Educational institutions are covered by EPF and MP Act.  Uttr. HC 455

·         Order of the EPF Authority covering the ‘associate members’ from retrospective effect is to be set aside. Chhat. HC 456

Credit: Labour Law Reporter

Top